A Review of Killing The Shadows by Val McDermid

I don’t think that I’ve read a book written by Val McDermid before so from the first page it was like starting out in unexplored territory, not knowing what to expect.

The main character is Professor Fiona Cameron, in her late thirties and lives with crime thriller writer Kit Martin in London. She is a psychologist, teaches but also uses computers to build up crime linkage and geographical profiles to help the police in their search for serial killers. She works out where they may physically live and the links between crimes by inputting details into a specially designed programme rather than character profiles, an idea that I find fascinating.

There are several different storylines running alongside each other, multi layered the cover says. That sounds as if the book could be confusing but it wasn’t, for me it added to the tension and made the book more interesting.

One of the sub plots is that Fiona is called to help in the search for a serial killer in Toledo, Spain. Bodies of tourists are found displayed in surroundings important to the history of Toledo and the police are baffled. They have no clues and no ideas as far as motive is concerned. Fiona and Kit fly out to Toledo and Fiona visits the murder scenes. She doesn’t really need to because her work is done on the computer with facts, but her visiting the murder scenes of each case reassures the police who don’t understand how the programme works.

She inputs what facts are available and comes up with an area that the killer probably lives in. She can see that the crimes are against tourists – all armed with the same travel book and points out that this killer must hate tourists and perhaps his or her life has been badly affected by tourism at some point. She then asks for details of older crimes against tourists that haven’t resulted in death. When these crimes are input into the programme she comes up with a different area and suggests that perhaps the killer had moved from that area to the other area and that the reason for the move had angered the killer and that the assaults had accelerated into killings. This is enough information for the police to open new lines of inquiry but I won’t say if they were successful, my aim was to give more idea of the work that Fiona does.

At the same time crime thriller writer Drew Shand is murdered in Edinburgh. His death and the grusome display of his bloody remains are similar to a scene in one of his books. Because Drew is gay and into rough sex it is assumed by the police and media that his death was a sexual encounter gone wrong.

Fiona’s long-time friend Detective Inspector Steve Martin has problems. Susan Blanchard was raped and murdered on Hampstead Heath and the man who was charged with the murder has just been released from the Old Bailey. Freed because the judge said that the case was brought to court through entrapment and little real evidence. Steve needs some help from Fiona when he and his team decide to give up their free time to hunt the murderer, be it the man who was tried or somebody else entirely. The trail has gone cold and so is Fiona initially towards his need for help. She had vowed never to help London Met again after Steve’s superior had taken her off the case and put somebody less competent on it.

Jane Elias, another thriller writer is killed in a similar manner to a victim in one of her books. Her gruesome remains are found on her estate in County Wicklow, Ireland. The police and media believe that it is a copycat killer and don’t link it to the murder in Edinburgh. Despite that Kit and Fiona feel the beginning of fear, and distress because both writers were friends of Kit and they all wrote the same type of novels.

Throughout the book are extracts from a serial killers diary, describing what he does to his victims in an almost matter of fact way that left me shuddering but not feeling sick with the details. The extracts work well in helping to build up suspense and throughout you don’t know whose diary it is.

I found the main character Fiona quite cold and it wasn’t easy to build any empathy with her. She is driven by her sister’s unsolved murder many years earlier. She felt guilty because she had encouraged her to go to University and her choice of career stems from her pain and guilt at the murder. Her relationship with her friends and lover Kit show a warm side to her character but when about her business the coldness is there. Perhaps a defence mechanism against the gruesome nature of her work or maybe Val McDermid couldn’t imagine anything but a cold female in this line of work.

Kit remained a bit of an enigma to me. Maybe because he came across as very ordinary whereas I imagine a best selling author to be quite extraordinary. At times Fiona practically mothers him. You know that it comes from a fear of her losing somebody that she loved in a terrible way but wonder why he doesn’t get irritated more.

Steve comes across as a bit of a lovelorn wimp. Although he has a tough demanding career; unnaturally to me he hangs around with Fiona the woman who he has loved for years and her lover – talk about rubbing your nose in it.

The places that we visit in the book are described well and helped me to picture events more vividly. Scenes in the Scottish Highlands in particular almost made me feel as if I was there watching on.

Did I enjoy the book? So much that I couldn’t put it down and unlike me, missed going on the internet for a whole day in favour of reading it. I managed to complete all 549 pages within 2 days, which is quite a feat for me. It is fast paced and I found it totally compelling. From the first chapter I wanted to know what surprise the next one held and I was absorbed right until the breathtaking, exciting conclusion.

I didn’t guess the ending and found Killing The Shadows not totally but less predictable than some of the books that I’ve read recently. Crime thriller novels have never previously been my first choice of reading matter but some of the best books that I’ve read in recent months are of that genre and I would say that this novel is the most outstanding of anything that I’ve read for a long time. Apparently it’s not thought of as the best work by Val McDermid, if that’s the case then I can’t wait to read more of her work.

Patricia has been writing articles and reviews for many years. You can view
more of her work and find some great free advice about writing at the creative writing guideSubmit travel reviews and find free travel articles at Articles Abroad

Book Review – A Place Of Execution by Val McDermid

51T6T5BQ7QL._SL160_Author Val McDermid begins A Place Of Execution with a short introduction from fictitious writer Catherine Heathcote. We are told that London based journalist Catherine is researching and planning to write a book about Detective Inspector George Bennett’s first murder case that took place 35 years earlier. Catherine plans to speak to everybody possible involved and revisit the Derbyshire moorland area close to where she grew up and where she was indirectly affected by parental worry restricting her freedom because a girl her age had disappeared.

Following the introduction the larger part of the novel details the 1963 murder investigation, the conclusion to the case and the murder trial. The second part is set in 1998 and Catherine comes into the novel for the first time living in the area for 6 months while researching. We follow her visits to meet George and some of the others involved and the book closes with an interesting twist.

THE CASE

On a bitterly cold evening in December 1963 Inspector George Bennett is called in to investigate the disappearance of 13 year old Alison Carter. George is young and one of a new breed of University trained police officers. He is new to the job, it’s his first big case in charge and he needs to prove himself. Tommy Clough the Detective Sergeant investigating the case with George, drinks a lot but still has a better record than most for arrests. He seems a surly type, tough, not as sensitive as George and ideal to play good cop bad cop with.

Alison lives in the manor house of a tiny hamlet of 7 cottages with her mother Ruth and stepfather Philip Hawkin. The hamlet of Scardale is situated on the Derbyshire moors and shut off from the rest of the world by a gate on the narrow hillside road. Apart from Hawkin who inherited the house from his uncle a year earlier the rest of the villagers are mainly descended from 3 families who are all related to each other through marriage and have lived a mainly insular life for centuries.

One afternoon in December 1963 Alison came home from school and took her dog Shep out for a walk in the fields as usual. She doesn’t return home and the alarm is raised several hours later. Normally because Scardale is so isolated and everybody knows each other it’s felt to be a safe place. Only around 20 miles away and a few weeks beforehand two children Pauline Reade and John Kilbride had gone missing without trace. That was before Brady and Hindley were caught and a child disappearing so close to the others would obviously be possibly linked.

George and Tommy visit the manor house before starting the search and question worried mother Ruth and her husband Philip. You can empathise with Ruth and imagine what it feels like to be in her position, but she does seem far more controlled than you would expect of a mother who has lost a child. Philip you dislike from the start. This man is more interested in his dinner being on the table and shows little concern for the missing teenager or her mother. You want him to be the guilty party because of his callousness, but could somebody so self-centred have a reason for abducting and murdering a teenager I wondered.

A search with tracker dogs starts and not long afterwards Shep is found tied up unharmed but with elastoplast muzzling him. That points to a planned crime and the abductor being somebody Alison knows because the dog wouldn’t let a stranger use elastoplast on him without fighting back and making enough noise to alert the villagers.

Signs of a struggle are found in a Spinney and dashing hopes, some of Alisons blood soaked clothing is discovered several days later in a place that had been forgotten except to one villager.

During the days following the disappearance the villagers are questioned and are found to be distrusting and obstructive. Getting information out of them is frustrating for the police who would normally expect relatives to want to help more. They blame it on the insular way of life but the lack of leads and only being told what the villagers want them to know delays the inquiry and the longer it goes on the less the chances are of Alison being found alive and especially if she is out in the open. You are made to wonder if one of the villagers is responsible for Alison’s disappearance and if the rest are covering up for him or her.

The case almost becomes a crusade to George, especially as he has just discovered that his wife Ann is expecting their first child. It becomes more personal to him as he can now imagine how he would feel if it was his child that had been taken. George came across as a sensitive caring man, but a little bit too easily swayed by what he wants to believe to be a good detective.

National journalist Don Smart tries to link this case to the other disappearances despite being told that there are differences with this case. George hates the sensationalism that could harm the case and turn public opinion against him if he isn’t seen to be collaborating with the other police forces that he feels is a waste of time better spent on his investigation and not being sidetracked. I hadn’t thought about that angle and how much the press can affect a serious inquiry, but if the police have to be so careful of public opinion it can’t be easy. Much more help to George is a responsible local newspaper printing a full page poster of Alison and including it with every issue.

WHAT I THINK

What I didn’t like about this novel was the fictitious association with the moors murders. Maybe it’s just me but whenever I read something about the murders in a newspaper or book I find it distasteful. These were real children who were treated dreadfully, they have families who loved them and I’m sure it must be hard for them to see the murders being continuously dredged up and usually for gain or sensationalism. In this story the murders were used to make Alison’s disappearance more harrowing if it could be and to suggest from the start that Alison had been killed.

Val McDermid doesn’t overdo it with descriptions of places but even so I could picture the tiny hamlet and bleak wintry countryside surrounding it. It was bitterly cold and I could imagine the cold despite reading the book on a warm sunny day. I went back to 1963 and remembered how just one room would be heated and how just going a few yards into another unheated room could be painfully cold.

Alison liked her music and in her bedroom was a record player and records that her stepfather had bought her. Just like most teenagers back then she loved the Beatles, Cliff Richards and the Shadows and other popstars of the time. One of the things said in the book was that Alison’s favourite pin up was Dennis Tanner from Coronation Street. There was no TV reception in the valley so to my mind Alison would have been unlikely to have a soap star for a pin up. I smiled at the mention of Kraft Dairylea triangles. I had forgotten that these were around in the 60s when I was a child and I felt that little additions like this worked well in setting the 1963 scene.

As often happens in crime novels nowadays a paedophile and his gruesome photograph collection is part of the story. Just how much I cannot say, but be warned if you cannot bear to read about something so disgusting.

Although the last part slowed in pace I found the main part of the 404 page novel totally gripping and so readable that I had finished it within a day. I guessed most of the end of the story quite early on but that didn’t detract from my enjoyment of the book. I like an ending where not everything is as it seems and although skilfully written there were a few small clues along the way.

When I saw that the main part was a narrative by an invented author I thought it strange and unnecessary at first. Once I had finished the novel I could see that the idea worked well as a way of introducing another character and bringing the story forward in time.

This is the second book that I have read by this author and I found it just as good except for the use of the moors murders to heighten feeling – personal distaste but it knocked it down a bit in my estimation. Apart from that I highly recommend this novel and will be reading more of Val McDermid’s work in the future.

Patricia writes reviews and articles for the Creative Writing Guide and the Make Money From Writing sites where you can find some great free advice about writing and free writers tools worth over $3000.

Patricia also owns Ebook World where you can find some of the best digital
downloads
at bargain basement prices.